by It isn’t just semantics, nor some trivial, egotistical use of quotation marks. There is an actual and vast difference between inflation and “inflation.” And in the final results, that difference isn’t strictly or even mainly about consumer prices. Who cares, most people wonder. After all, what does it really matter why prices are going up so far? The pain this causes is pain regardless of any post hoc pedantry. Insisting on proper terminology, however, is an attempt to get people to focus up on the future, not litigate the past. It may seem the latter, though the stakes are far higher moving forward than debating what has already happened. What happened was never inflation. Sorry, it just wasn’t (and don’t need to take my word for it). But anyone is forgiven for
Topics:
Jeffrey P. Snider considers the following as important: 5.) Alhambra Investments, Consumer Prices, currencies, economy, Featured, Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy, imports, inflation, Inventory, Markets, newsletter, Retail sales
This could be interesting, too:
Marc Chandler writes Sterling and Gilts Pressed Lower by Firmer CPI
Ryan McMaken writes A Free-Market Guide to Trump’s Immigration Crackdown
Wanjiru Njoya writes Post-Election Prospects for Ending DEI
Swiss Customs writes Octobre 2024 : la chimie-pharma détermine le record à l’export
It isn’t just semantics, nor some trivial, egotistical use of quotation marks. There is an actual and vast difference between inflation and “inflation.” And in the final results, that difference isn’t strictly or even mainly about consumer prices.
Who cares, most people wonder. After all, what does it really matter why prices are going up so far? The pain this causes is pain regardless of any post hoc pedantry.
Insisting on proper terminology, however, is an attempt to get people to focus up on the future, not litigate the past. It may seem the latter, though the stakes are far higher moving forward than debating what has already happened.
| What happened was never inflation. Sorry, it just wasn’t (and don’t need to take my word for it). But anyone is forgiven for believing otherwise. The term was thrown around wildly by practically everyone from the studious and stuffy Economist to the local media commentator along with laypersons all over the world.
Anyone who dared correct the matter was immediately accused of the current culture’s equivalent blasphemy, at best being astonishingly obtuse. It was 1979 all over again, they boisterously declared, without the first idea what actually happened in the (sixties and) seventies.
This misidentification was near universal. Big Execs at Big Companies tasked with doing the Big Things, just like everyone else they, too, all surrendered easily to the sordid spell of what had been a price illusion. Easily confusing accelerating CPIs for accelerating legit recovery because who has ever been shown the difference? As with all things, it starts with Economics. To this day, companies big and small use mainstream, neo-Keynesian econometric models (packaged neatly into sellable though useless products like the Blue Chip Economic Survey) to forecast and make crucial business decisions. Neo-Keynesians and their models simply love the idea of “stimulus.” In fact, they love it so much whenever any government does anything and slaps that label on whichever newest program, econometricians rush to update their simulations with presumed positive results. They’ll claim to the final days of Earth that “stimulus” produces a multiplier greater than one. |
 . |
 . |
|
| When Spring 2021 turned to Summer 2021, Economists told their various Big Corporate Customers that Uncle Sam’s massive helicopter drop (which wasn’t a true helicopter no matter how many times people say it was; redistribution at best) would not only shift the demand curve in the US, it would shift it for much of the world and, best part, make that shift permanent (their greater-than-one multiplier).
Big Business at that time was focused elsewhere, struggling with other worries, notably railroads, truckers and chassis, West Coast port problems, you remember the things. Having just been told that demand had been Big Time Juiced, and that it was going to stay juiced, with dollar signs (rather than eurodollars) in everyone’s eyes the race was on to order everything and anything. Just make it, companies cried, and get it here as fast as humanly possible!
Overordering in such crude fashion was a complete afterthought, not even a worry because, greater-than-one multiplier, the models all said as frenzied as 2021 was turning out to be (though not for service providers; maybe that should’ve figured in here somewhere first), 2022 would be even better. Just make the stuff, get it on a boat and moving. They even called it “investment”; as in, inventory. On its third quarter conference call held last November 17, Big Box Retail Giant Target (not the official company name) referred to its smart inventory investment repeatedly. Boasted their foresight. |
 . |
But you could tell the purpose wasn’t making investments, it was going the extra mile (literally, in some cases) for the sweet smell of consumer opportunity.
Just how “healthy” was Target’s “position overall?”
Also the few weeks after those. Then several more weeks. Months. Many months. And it’s still coming (see: imports for April 2022, latest data below). |
 . |
| Despite entering the holiday season with a third more inventory than during 2019’s rather crappy Christmas shopping, no one was worried. Say it with me, greater-than-one demand multiplier.
Economics had mixed up supply shock with inflation, and passed it along as recovery to the world. Even now fixing the mistake is near impossible (see: media). The difference between genuine inflation (money, always money) and “inflation” is starting to take hold. To begin with, it had been Target along with Walmart which recently had admitted consumers were changing spending habits. And not in the way econometrics had pre-assigned. |
 . |
 . |
|
Today, Target is back in the news because of, surprise, inventory. Apocalyptic inventory, though the mainstream press is having a doozy of a time trying to make sense of what’s going on.
Even now, the media doesn’t get it right, can’t get it right; look at the first sentence of the second paragraph. |
 . |
| Utter nonsense in Chicago, to which the Tribune adds, “The speed at which Americans pivoted away from pandemic spending was laid bare in the most recent quarterly financial filings from a number of major retailers.”
Pivoted away from spending, period. Clinging to the inflation narrative to the bitter end, an end whose expiration was both predictable as well as now in sight. “Inflation” contrary to inflation is a harmful redistribution of economic spending power and resources, having little or nothing to do with excessive money or currency (which we know never happened because the monetary system itself continuously said so). Someone once observed how fools and their money are easily parted. What about fools chasing what they thought was money into inventory? They can’t even give it away. And it’s not just Target who is about to try. All because it was never inflation. |
 . |
 . |
You Might Also Like
Shipping Around Retail ‘Inflation’
2022-05-22
This whole “inflation” scenario isn’t really that difficult to piece together, effect from cause. Sure, Jay Powell’s trying to nuke it by hiking the federal funds rate, but no one really uses fed funds and the problem isn’t the unsecured cost of borrowing bank reserves (not money) that are literally overflowing.
T-bills Targeted Target
2022-05-20
Yesterday’s market “volatility” spilled (way) over into this morning’s trading. It ended up being a very striking example, perhaps the clearest and most alarming yet, of a scramble for collateral. The 4-week T-bill, well, the chart speaks for itself:During past scrambles, such as those last year, they didn’t look like this. They would hit, stick around for an hour, maybe a bit longer, and then clear up as collateral books get balanced in repo like derivatives, the system sorting out, and handing out, any short run consequences.This time, this morning, it was sustained bids all the way from Asia through Europe into the US open. It shouldn’t have been surprising given the strains of illiquid-ness all over global markets yesterday. To give you a sense of the difference, I’ll include a chart
Synchronizing Chinese Prices (and consequences)
2022-05-14
It isn’t just the vast difference between Chinese consumer prices and those in the US or Europe, China’s CPI has been categorically distinct from China’s PPI, too. That distance hints at the real problem which the whole is just now beginning to confront, having been lulled into an inflationary illusion made up from all these things.
Not Good Goods
2022-04-24
The goods economy in the United States is – maybe was – the lone economic bright spot. That in and of itself should’ve provoked more caution, instead there was the red-hot recovery to sell under the cover of supply shock pricing changes. The sheer spending on goods, and how they arrived, each unabashedly artificial from the get-go.
China More and More Beyond ‘Inflation’
2022-04-17
If only the rest of the world could have such problems. Chinese consumer prices were flat from February 2022 to March, even though gasoline and energy costs predictably skyrocketed. According to China’s NBS, gas was up 7.2% month-over-month while diesel costs on average gained 7.8%.
Briefing Even More Inventory
2022-03-01
Retail sales stumbled in December, contributing some to the explosion in inventory across the US supply chain – but not all. Inventories were going to spike even if sales had been better. In fact, retail inventories rose at such a record pace beyond anything seen before, had sales been far improved the monthly increase in inventories still would’ve unlike anything in the data series.
FOMC Goes With Unemployment Rate While This Huge Number Happens To Far More Relevant Economic Data
2022-01-29
The first time I can consciously remember using the term landmine was probably here in February 2019. I had described the same process play out several times before, I had just never applied that term. There was all sorts of market chaos in the final two months of 2018, including a full-on stock market correction, believe it or not, leaving the inflation and recovery narrative in near complete tatters.
US CPI Reaches Seven On US Goods Prices, With Disinflation Setting In Everywhere Else (incl. US Services)
2022-01-16
How is that US Treasury rates out in the independent longer end of the yield curve have now “suffered” a seven percent CPI to go along with double taper and triple maybe quadruple (if the whispers are to be believed) rate hikes this year, yet have weathered all of that allegedly bond-busting brutality with barely a market fluctuation?
Tags: Consumer Prices,currencies,economy,Featured,Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy,imports,inflation,Inventory,Markets,newsletter,Retail sales