VoxEU, September 27, 2023. HTML. From the conclusions: … it is critical to account for indirect in addition to direct social costs and benefits when ranking monetary architectures. … the costs and benefits we consider point to an important role of central bank digital currency in an optimal monetary architecture unless pass-through funding is necessary to stabilise capital investment and very costly. … the interest rate on CBDC should differ from zero and from the rate on reserves. From the text: Notes: The dark grey area represents the efficiency advantage of CBDC needed to make it less costly than a two-tier system with optimum reserve holdings. The light grey area displays the same object but based on actual US reserve holdings rather than model-implied optimal ones. These
Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Bank regulation, Central bank digital currency, Central bank loan, Contributions, Distortion, Liquidity, Pass-through funding, Payment, Payment operations, too big to fail
This could be interesting, too:
Dirk Niepelt writes Panel on the Economics of CBDC, Riksbank, 2023
Dirk Niepelt writes “A Macroeconomic Perspective on Retail CBDC and the Digital Euro,” EIZ, 2023
Dirk Niepelt writes “Money and Banking with Reserves and CBDC,” CEPR, 2023
Dirk Niepelt writes Report of the Banking Stability Expert Group
VoxEU, September 27, 2023. HTML.
From the conclusions:
… it is critical to account for indirect in addition to direct social costs and benefits when ranking monetary architectures.
… the costs and benefits we consider point to an important role of central bank digital currency in an optimal monetary architecture unless pass-through funding is necessary to stabilise capital investment and very costly.
… the interest rate on CBDC should differ from zero and from the rate on reserves.
From the text:
Notes: The dark grey area represents the efficiency advantage of CBDC needed to make it less costly than a two-tier system with optimum reserve holdings. The light grey area displays the same object but based on actual US reserve holdings rather than model-implied optimal ones. These distributions allow for pass-through costs and tax distortions, quantified by assuming taxing households causes deadweight burdens of 25% per tax dollar. The distributions are based on two million realisations.