by Accepted for publication in the Journal of Monetary Economics, with Markus Brunnermeier. (NBER wp.) When does a swap between private and public money leave the equilibrium allocation and price system unchanged? To answer this question, the paper sets up a generic model of money and liquidity which identifies sources of seignorage rents and liquidity bubbles. We derive sufficient conditions for equivalence and apply them in the context of the “Chicago Plan”, cryptocurrencies, the Indian de-monetization experiment, and Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Our results imply that CBDC coupled with central bank pass-through funding need not imply a credit crunch nor undermine financial stability.
Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: bubble, Central bank digital currency, Chicago plan, Equivalence, Liquidity, Means of payment, Money, Politico-economic equivalence, Research, Reserves for all
This could be interesting, too:
Keith Weiner writes The Anti-Concepts of Money: Conclusion
Dirk Niepelt writes Bank of England CBDC Academic Advisory Group
Dirk Niepelt writes Panel on “Will the digital euro take off?,” CEPR, 2023
Dirk Niepelt writes Conference on “The Macroeconomic Implications of Central Bank Digital Currencies,” CEPR/ECB, 2023
Accepted for publication in the Journal of Monetary Economics, with Markus Brunnermeier. (NBER wp.)
When does a swap between private and public money leave the equilibrium allocation and price system unchanged? To answer this question, the paper sets up a generic model of money and liquidity which identifies sources of seignorage rents and liquidity bubbles. We derive sufficient conditions for equivalence and apply them in the context of the “Chicago Plan”, cryptocurrencies, the Indian de-monetization experiment, and Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Our results imply that CBDC coupled with central bank pass-through funding need not imply a credit crunch nor undermine financial stability.