by On the FT’s Alphaville blog, Izabella Kaminska points to a paper by Italian academics arguing that the Ethereum technology tends to incubate Ponzi schemes. The uniqueness of the “smart Ponzi” is its capacity to protect the identity of the initiator but also its ability to persist even after being exposed. Since contracts are unmodifiable and thus unstoppable there is no central authority to terminate the execution of the scheme or force the initiator to refund victims. What’s more, the inability to shut it down means victims can be led to believe the scheme will last forever.
Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Blockchain, Crime, Distributed ledger, Ethereum, Notes, Ponzi game
This could be interesting, too:
Fintechnews Switzerland writes Crypto VC Funding Remains Steady at USB in 2024
Fintechnews Switzerland writes 10 Must Read Bitcoin and Blockchain Blogs and Webpages
Fintechnews Switzerland writes BlackRock Plans to Launch Bitcoin-Linked ETP in Switzerland
Dirk Niepelt writes Does the US Administration Prohibit the Use of Reserves?
On the FT’s Alphaville blog, Izabella Kaminska points to a paper by Italian academics arguing that the Ethereum technology tends to incubate Ponzi schemes.
The uniqueness of the “smart Ponzi” is its capacity to protect the identity of the initiator but also its ability to persist even after being exposed. Since contracts are unmodifiable and thus unstoppable there is no central authority to terminate the execution of the scheme or force the initiator to refund victims. What’s more, the inability to shut it down means victims can be led to believe the scheme will last forever.