Does Decentralized Intermediation Add Value?

Summary:
On the FT’s Alphaville blog, Izabella Kaminska questions the value of decentralization (and thus, blockchain technology) in intermediation. Decentralisation is, in almost all cases, not an efficiency. To the contrary, it’s a cost that adds complexity and creates an unnecessary burden for both users and operators unless centralised layers are added on top of it — defying the whole point. … At the end of the day, there are only two groups of people prepared to go to costly lengths to decentralise a service which is already available (in what is often a much higher quality form) in a centralised or conventional hierarchal state. One group is criminals and fraudsters. The other is ideologues and cultists. … It’s not privacy, because a centralised system can be encrypted just as much as a

Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Blockchain, Centralization, Crime, Decentralization, Distributed ledger, Intermediation, Notes

This could be interesting, too:

Fintechnews Switzerland writes 21Shares and Crypto.com Forge Strategic Partnership

Fintechnews Switzerland writes Taurus Partners with Aktionariat to Launch Token Secondary Market for SMEs

Dirk Niepelt writes “Governments are bigger than ever. They are also more useless”

Fintechnews Switzerland writes LUKB bietet neu sichere Ein- und Auslieferung von Kryptowährungen an