The S&P 500 recorded a key reversal on May 1, and the end of the tariff truce ensured follow-through selling. With today’s early losses, it is off nearly 3.5% this month. In my brief chat with Stuart Varney at Fox Business, I suggest that the stretched technical condition left the market vulnerable to a “buy in May and go away” scenario. There was some suggestion that comments by Atlanta’s Fed’s Bostic playing down a rate cut may have spurred some losses. While this is possible, I see the market as rejecting other signals by Fed officials that it will be patient and in a wait-and-see mode. Despite attempts by some journalists and analysts to find differences, Fed officials have been singing from the same hymn book.
Topics:
Marc Chandler considers the following as important: 4) FX Trends, Cool Video, Featured, newsletter, SPX
This could be interesting, too:
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Krypto-Ausblick 2025: Stehen Bitcoin, Ethereum & Co. vor einem Boom oder Einbruch?
Connor O'Keeffe writes The Establishment’s “Principles” Are Fake
Per Bylund writes Bitcoiners’ Guide to Austrian Economics
Ron Paul writes What Are We Doing in Syria?
The S&P 500 recorded a key reversal on May 1, and the end of the tariff truce ensured follow-through selling. With today’s early losses, it is off nearly 3.5% this month. In my brief chat with Stuart Varney at Fox Business, I suggest that the stretched technical condition left the market vulnerable to a “buy in May and go away” scenario.
There was some suggestion that comments by Atlanta’s Fed’s Bostic playing down a rate cut may have spurred some losses. While this is possible, I see the market as rejecting other signals by Fed officials that it will be patient and in a wait-and-see mode. Despite attempts by some journalists and analysts to find differences, Fed officials have been singing from the same hymn book. Perhaps what as unusual (in the modern sense) presidential lobbying for rates cuts and quantitative easing, it has given Fed officials an incentive to close ranks.
I suggested that trade tensions with China and the broader consequences were the main trigger. The implied yield of the January fed funds futures contract has fallen 14-16 bp since the tweets declared the end of the tariff truce. The implied yield of 2.095% compares with the current effective average of about 2.39%.
Huawei was not initially about trade. It was a security violation. President Trump himself linked easing pressure on Huawei with a trade agreement. The escalation of the confrontation with Huawei and the nationalist chords being played in both countries make a quick resolution unlikely.
In the spring of 2018, US Treasury Secretary Mnuchin and China had appeared to strike an agreement. Trump rejected it, and the tariffs began shortly thereafter. The truce was reached when Trump and Xi met at the end of the year. Given the tensions, Lighthizer and/or Mnuchin going back to China at this juncture would likely be symbolic. We suggest that the next window of opportunity may be the G20 summit in Japan at the end of next month. Previously, the venue was promoted as a place to sign a final agreement. Now, the best that can be hoped for is re-start of serious negotiations.
The target I suggested for the S&P 500 is 2700-2720, and knowing the Varney watches the Dow Industrials, a similar objective is near 24700-25000.
Here is a link to the 2.5-minute clip.
Tags: Cool Video,Featured,newsletter,SPX