Blockchains, dApps, and Smart Contracts—A Critical Review

Summary:
Blog post by Dave Peck and the PSL team. Some issues they discuss: Very few categories of data belong on-chain … Today’s smart contract programming models are deeply flawed … Smart contracts can’t reference the “real-world”. They can only reference the blockchain itself. This is known as the “oracle problem” and it makes blockchains a necessarily closed system. This may sound like a trivial problem, but it is actually profound. For instance, it forces smart contract developers to jump through hoops to build “price oracles” when they want their on-chain code to reference real-world asset prices. Companies like Chainlink act as oracles, Smart contracts can’t be upgraded … Smart contracts require complex distributed systems to run, effectively, forever. Distributed consensus technology

Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Blockchain, Chainlink, Coin, dApp, Decentralization, Notes, Price oracle, Smart contract, Token

This could be interesting, too:

Fintechnews Switzerland writes 21Shares and Crypto.com Forge Strategic Partnership

Fintechnews Switzerland writes Taurus Partners with Aktionariat to Launch Token Secondary Market for SMEs

Dirk Niepelt writes “Governments are bigger than ever. They are also more useless”

Fintechnews Switzerland writes LUKB bietet neu sichere Ein- und Auslieferung von Kryptowährungen an