On his blog, Urs Birchler offers different perspectives on the question whether the Swiss National Bank (SNB) is obliged to pay out banks’ reserves in cash. One view: Reserves are legal tender. The SNB therefore is not obliged to exchange reserves against cash. Another view: According to the law, the SNB is required to provide sufficient cash. Moreover, reserves and cash were meant to be perfect substitutes. Yet another view: Lawmakers would have written a different law had they known that the SNB considers it necessary to impose negative interest rates.
Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Cash, Interest Rate, Notes, Reserves, Swiss National Bank, Zero lower bound
This could be interesting, too:
Dirk Niepelt writes “Report by the Parliamentary Investigation Committee on the Conduct of the Authorities in the Context of the Emergency Takeover of Credit Suisse”
Marc Chandler writes US Dollar is Offered and China’s Politburo Promises more Monetary and Fiscal Support
Marc Chandler writes China’s Politburo Validates and Extends Pivot while the US Dollar Sees Yesterday’s Gains Pared
Dirk Niepelt writes “Governments are bigger than ever. They are also more useless”
On his blog, Urs Birchler offers different perspectives on the question whether the Swiss National Bank (SNB) is obliged to pay out banks’ reserves in cash.
- One view: Reserves are legal tender. The SNB therefore is not obliged to exchange reserves against cash.
- Another view: According to the law, the SNB is required to provide sufficient cash. Moreover, reserves and cash were meant to be perfect substitutes.
- Yet another view: Lawmakers would have written a different law had they known that the SNB considers it necessary to impose negative interest rates.