by Asset inflation benefits the super-rich more than anyone else because they own the vast majority of these assets. With the reflation euphoria running full blast, maybe central banks will finally get all that inflation they’ve been pining for. So let’s ask cui bono–who will benefit from inflation? The Super-Rich love inflation and the money-printing that generates it. Longtime correspondent Michael M. explains the dynamic behind billionaires’ adoration of inflation: “Why does a game of Monopoly work? Because there is a zero-boundary for every player’s net worth. If you were given endless credit (so negative net worth is allowed without limit), the game becomes pointless. Is there also an upper bound at Monopoly? Well, the bank at Monopoly can run out of money, I
Topics:
Charles Hugh Smith considers the following as important: 5) Global Macro, 5.) Charles Hugh Smith, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
RIA Team writes The Importance of Emergency Funds in Retirement Planning
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Gesetzesvorschlag in Arizona: Wird Bitcoin bald zur Staatsreserve?
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes So bewegen sich Bitcoin & Co. heute
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Aktueller Marktbericht zu Bitcoin & Co.
|
Asset inflation benefits the super-rich more than anyone else because they own the vast majority of these assets. With the reflation euphoria running full blast, maybe central banks will finally get all that inflation they’ve been pining for. So let’s ask cui bono–who will benefit from inflation? The Super-Rich love inflation and the money-printing that generates it. “Why does a game of Monopoly work? Because there is a zero-boundary for every player’s net worth. If you were given endless credit (so negative net worth is allowed without limit), the game becomes pointless. Is there also an upper bound at Monopoly? Well, the bank at Monopoly can run out of money, I had that happen a few times while playing. But we didn’t treat it as an upper boundary, but wrote the richest player an IOU and took that amount of cash bills from him and put them back in the bank to continue. |
Wilshire Total Market Cap Index vs. Nominal GDP, 1972-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| Rolling it around in my head, how else could you solve that problem? Confiscate the same amount from every (remaining) player and put it back in the bank instead? That would be pointless if most wealth is with one player and you want the game to continue.
Another option is to go Keynesian in its true practical implementation and confiscate 10% of each player’s net worth to “re-liquidate” the bank. This is very similar to But that’s linear (a fixed percentage), so why not go with progressive confiscation rates, and take a higher percentage of the wealthier players’ net worth? Wait a second, did I just stumble over the reason why the filthy rich love Keynesian economics? Because printing money only “taxes” everybody linearly, which is much better for the rich than progressive taxation, which is the global standard in income tax policies.” Let’s explore this profound insight a bit more. Modern Monetary Theory (MMT) holds that central banks/states can print as much money as they want without any adverse effects. From this, it’s a small step to sending every household a monthly stipend (Universal Basic Income–UBI) paid by freshly issued currency. Given the unfairness of the income tax system, as the super-rich buy tax breaks, tax shelters and subsidies via lobbying and political contributions, it’s just one more tiny step to eliminating income taxes entirely and printing all the money the state needs. Why would this enrich the super-rich and impoverish the rest of us? Inflation is best defined as a loss of purchasing power. With 10% inflation, $1 only The super-rich don’t rely on wages or cash savings; they own productive assets whose yields rise with inflation. The super-rich own apartments, so they can jack rents up 10%, matching inflation. They own assets which tend to retain their purchasing power even as inflation reduces the purchasing power of cash and wages. |
US Private Sector Financial Assets, 1950-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| Markets place a premium on any assets that keep pace or outpace inflation, so the value of the assets owned by the super-rich soar, further enriching the few who own these assets.
Asset inflation benefits the super-rich more than anyone else because they own the vast majority of these assets. So money-printing and the inflation it generates is a win-win for the rich. The “tax” rate of inflation / money- printing barely touches their incomes or wealth, both of which are tied to assets that rise along with inflation. All that money-printing pushes the value of their assets higher, making them even richer, which the inflation “tax” impoverishes everyone who depends on wages and cash. No wonder the super-rich love MMT, money-printing and Keynesian giveaways of freshly printed currency–inflation makes them richer while it makes everyone else poorer. Going back to Michael’s analogy of a Monopoly game: inflation takes 10% of every player’s cash, but doesn’t touch their property holdings. So the wealthiest players’ net worth is barely dinted while players with fewer assets will find it difficult to survive as their cash is “taxed” away by inflation. |
 |
You Might Also Like
What Makes You Think the Stock Market Will Even Exist in 2024?
Given the extremes of the stock market’s frauds and even greater extremes of wealth/income inequality it has created, tell me again why the stock market will still exist in 2024? When I read a financial pundit predicting a bull market in stocks through 2024, blah-blah-blah, I wonder: what makes you think the stock market will even exist in 2024, at least in its current form?
It’s Do-or-Die, Deep State: Either Strangle the Stock Market Rally Now or Cede the Election to Trump
With only 56 trading days and fewer than 80 calendar days to the election, the Deep State camps seeking to torpedo Trump’s re-election have reached the do-or-die point. Back in June I speculated that the only way the Deep State could deep-six Trump’s re-election was to sink the stock market rally, which the president has long touted as evidence of his economic leadership.
Will Skilled Hands-On Labor Finally Become More Valuable?
The sands beneath what’s scarce and what’s over-abundant are shifting. On a recent visit to the welding shop where my niece’s husband works, I asked him if they had enough welders for their workload.
Nihilism Embodied: Our Lawless Financial System
Not only have the billionaire class made money, they have tightened their monopolistic grip on the levers of money supply and distribution, turning a global rigged casino into a global company town.
The Empire of Uncertainty
Anyone claiming they can project the trajectory of the U.S. and global economy is deluding themselves. Normalcy depends entirely on everyday life being predictable. To be predictable, life must
be stable, which means that there is a high level of certainty in every aspect of life.
Things Change
Things change, supposedly immutable systems crumble and delusions die. That’s the lay of the land in the The Empire of Uncertainty I described yesterday.
The New Tyranny Few Even Recognize
Clearly, the Fed reckons the public is foolish enough to believe the Fed’s money will actually be "free." It’s pretty much universally recognized that authorities use crises to impose "emergency
powers" that become permanent.
How Systems Collapse: Reaping What We’ve Sown
Don’t expect healthcare or any other hollowed-out, heavily optimized system to function as it once did. A great many Americans will be shocked when our healthcare systems start failing because
they believed the PR that "we have the finest healthcare system in the world.
Tags: Featured,newsletter