by Summary:
It’s tough to pay for an Olympics when 95% of your supposed “wealth” has vanished. In the modern era (1896-present), the Olympics have only been cancelled in wartime: 1916 (World War I), 1940 and 1944 (World War II). But world war is not the only circumstance that could derail the Olympics; a global crisis in energy, finance or geopolitics could send the risks and costs of the Olympics beyond the reach of most participants. The key to understanding the odds of an Olympic cancellation is Liebig’s Law of the Minimum, which states states that “growth is controlled not by the total amount of resources available, but by the scarcest resource.” As I have outlined elsewhere, the three resources that will become increasingly scarce globally going forward are: 1. Geopolitical stability 2. Energy abundance (i.e. abundant and affordable to the bottom 95%) 3. Financial/currency stability A global scarcity of any of these three could sink the Olympics in 2020 and 2022. I’ve discussed the geopolitical, financial and resource risks in four recent posts: Olympiad The current confidence that everything will remain stable for years to come is based on a misleading extrapolation of current trends.
Topics:
Charles Hugh Smith considers the following as important: Featured, newsletter, The United States
This could be interesting, too:
It’s tough to pay for an Olympics when 95% of your supposed “wealth” has vanished. In the modern era (1896-present), the Olympics have only been cancelled in wartime: 1916 (World War I), 1940 and 1944 (World War II). But world war is not the only circumstance that could derail the Olympics; a global crisis in energy, finance or geopolitics could send the risks and costs of the Olympics beyond the reach of most participants. The key to understanding the odds of an Olympic cancellation is Liebig’s Law of the Minimum, which states states that “growth is controlled not by the total amount of resources available, but by the scarcest resource.” As I have outlined elsewhere, the three resources that will become increasingly scarce globally going forward are: 1. Geopolitical stability 2. Energy abundance (i.e. abundant and affordable to the bottom 95%) 3. Financial/currency stability A global scarcity of any of these three could sink the Olympics in 2020 and 2022. I’ve discussed the geopolitical, financial and resource risks in four recent posts: Olympiad The current confidence that everything will remain stable for years to come is based on a misleading extrapolation of current trends.
Topics:
Charles Hugh Smith considers the following as important: Featured, newsletter, The United States
This could be interesting, too:
Guillermo Alcala writes USD/CHF slides to test 0.8645 support with US inflation data on tap
Swissinfo writes Swiss central bank posts CHF62.5bn profit
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Trump-Faktor und Marktbedingungen könnten für neuen Bitcoin-Rekord sorgen
Charles Hugh Smith writes Is Social Media Actually “Media,” Or Is It Something Else?
It’s tough to pay for an Olympics when 95% of your supposed “wealth” has vanished.
|
In the modern era (1896-present), the Olympics have only been cancelled in wartime: 1916 (World War I), 1940 and 1944 (World War II). But world war is not the only circumstance that could derail the Olympics; a global crisis in energy, finance or geopolitics could send the risks and costs of the Olympics beyond the reach of most participants.
The key to understanding the odds of an Olympic cancellation is Liebig’s Law of the Minimum, which states states that “growth is controlled not by the total amount of resources available, but by the scarcest resource.”
As I have outlined elsewhere, the three resources that will become increasingly scarce globally going forward are:
1. Geopolitical stability
2. Energy abundance (i.e. abundant and affordable to the bottom 95%)
3. Financial/currency stability
A global scarcity of any of these three could sink the Olympics in 2020 and 2022. I’ve discussed the geopolitical, financial and resource risks in four recent posts:
|
 Olympiad |
|
The current confidence that everything will remain stable for years to come is based on a misleading extrapolation of current trends. Just because the global status quo has managed to maintain a facade or normalcy for the past eight years does not mean the New Normal (central banks pumping $180 billion a month into the global financial system to keep it afloat) is identical with the pre-crisis Old Normal.
Seneca’s Cliff offers a more accurate model of reality: everything stays the same until it doesn’t. The slide down is much faster and more abrupt than the steady advance to the cliff’s edge:
The reality is the status quo has been forced to increase its interventions just to maintain the steady-state facade of normalcy. This constant increase of resources being devoted to prop up an unsustainable system is not consequence-free; the effort generates unintended consequences and increases the systemic risks.
The status quo must then ramp up its interventions and manipulations to compensate for the strains and risks breaking through the carefully managed facade of normalcy.
War is not the only possible disruptor of the 2020-2022 Olympics. Geopolitical tensions could rise to the point that boycotts effectively gut the Olympics. Global disruptions of energy (severe shortages and soaring costs) could put the Olympics out of reach for many participants–and of course these two risks are connected. Energy shortages and geopolitical conflicts go hand in hand.
|
The Seneca Cliff Click to enlarge. |
|
A funny thing happens in a severe currency crisis: 95% of the phantom wealth suddenly disappears. The value of fiat currencies is established by a number of factors, but the primary one is demand for the currency, which is tied to participants’ trust that the currency will retain its current value (or appreciate) going forward.
Once that trust is lost, the downward spiral creates panic selling.
In the current narrative, central banks can always “save the day” by printing money or opening the floodgates of unlimited credit. The problem won’t be a lack of currency or credit–the problem will be a scarcity of trustworthy collateral to back up the credit and currency. If the value of the collateral is impaired, the credit leveraged on the collateral will also be impaired.
In other words, a loss of faith in a currency cannot be reversed when faith in the central bank’s magical powers has also been lost. The dramatic decline in the purchasing power of Venezuela’s currency offers a modern-day example of what happens to phantom wealth in a currency crisis.
|
Venezuela’s Inflation Click to enlarge. |
It’s tough to pay for an Olympics when 95% of your supposed “wealth” has vanished. To save face, the host nation may attempt a severely truncated Olympics with a few participants and mostly empty venues, but the reality will be visible to all: it would have been better to cancel the Olympics and avoid the embarrassment of a failed show crippled by scarcities.
What are the odds that the 2020-2022 Olympics will be cancelled (or completely distrupted)? A lot higher than most people think.
Of related interest: