Sunday , February 23 2025
Home / SNB & CHF / Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?

Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?

Summary:
Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage. Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending? [embedded content] Tags: Featured,newsletter

Topics:
Joakim Book considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

RIA Team writes The Importance of Emergency Funds in Retirement Planning

Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Gesetzesvorschlag in Arizona: Wird Bitcoin bald zur Staatsreserve?

Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes So bewegen sich Bitcoin & Co. heute

Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Aktueller Marktbericht zu Bitcoin & Co.

Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage.

Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?


Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *