Tuesday , November 12 2024
Home / SNB & CHF / Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?

Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?

Summary:
Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage. Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending? [embedded content] Tags: Featured,newsletter

Topics:
Joakim Book considers the following as important: , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Frank Shostak writes Assumptions in Economics and in the Real World

Conor Sanderson writes The Betrayal of Free Speech: Elon Musk Buckles to Government Censorship, Again

Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Bitcoin erstmals über 80.000 US-Dollar

Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Kraken kündigt eigene Blockchain ‘Ink’ an – Neue Ära für den Krypto-Markt?

Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage.

Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?


Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *