Summary:
[unable to retrieve full-text content]In late May we learned that, after a five-month deployment to one of the most dangerous cities in the world, the American military would finally be going home. Well, not really. They already were home. The dangerous warzone was the American federal capital, Washington, DC. And the “danger” that the military was supposed to be countering was entirely government made.
Topics:
Jason Morgan considers the following as important: 6b) Mises.org, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
[unable to retrieve full-text content][unable to retrieve full-text content]In late May we learned that, after a five-month deployment to one of the most dangerous cities in the world, the American military would finally be going home. Well, not really. They already were home. The dangerous warzone was the American federal capital, Washington, DC. And the “danger” that the military was supposed to be countering was entirely government made.
Topics:
Jason Morgan considers the following as important: 6b) Mises.org, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
Bretigne Shaffer writes Without the State, Who Would Confiscate the Generators?
Claudio Grass writes The permacrisis strategy: the mortal dangers of our “new normal”
Mark Thornton writes Keynes Was Not Much Better at Investing than He Was at Understanding Economics
Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. writes Why Equality Is Bad
In late May we learned that, after a five-month deployment to one of the most dangerous cities in the world, the American military would finally be going home. Well, not really. They already were home. The dangerous warzone was the American federal capital, Washington, DC. And the “danger” that the military was supposed to be countering was entirely government made.