Friday , November 15 2024
Home / SNB & CHF / Swiss agricultural policy costs households 2,500 francs a year, according to study

Swiss agricultural policy costs households 2,500 francs a year, according to study

Summary:
© Denis Linine | Dreamstime.com Broadly, Switzerland’s agricultural sector costs the country CHF 19.9 billion while contributing only CHF 3.4 billion, concludes a study published by the think tank Avenir Suisse. The CHF 19.9 billion cost the report’s authors calculate is made up of tax breaks and direct federal and cantonal payments to the sector ...

Topics:
Investec considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Michael Njoku writes Totalitarianism Begins With A Denial of Economics

Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes US-Wahl treibt Bitcoin über 90’000 US-Dollar – wie Anleger vom neuen Krypto-Hype profitieren können

Jim Fedako writes Subjectivity and Demonstrated Preference: A Possible Paradox

Mises Institute writes Elections and the Economy: Do They Really Matter?

© Denis Linine | Dreamstime.com

Broadly, Switzerland’s agricultural sector costs the country CHF 19.9 billion while contributing only CHF 3.4 billion, concludes a study published by the think tank Avenir Suisse.

The CHF 19.9 billion cost the report’s authors calculate is made up of tax breaks and direct federal and cantonal payments to the sector (4.9b), the cost of artificially inflated consumer prices due to import restrictions (4.6b), environmental damage (7.3b), and the indirect cost to export businesses (3.1b) from agricultural trade restrictions.

At 51% of farm receipts, Switzerland has the third highest level of farm subsidies in Europe after Norway and Iceland.

The cost of high consumer prices is based on international price comparisons, and the environmental cost brakes down into the cost of greenhouse gas emissions (0.4b), excess nitrogen damage (1.5b), pesticide and peat bog cleanup (0.2b) and lost biodiversity resulting from excess nitrogen and pesticide use (4.9b).

The 3.1b related to import restrictions, is based largely on a study which looks at the impact of reaching a full trade deal with the EFTA block.

84% of the total (16.7b) is borne by the public via taxes (4.9b), artificially high prices (4.6b) and environmental damage (7.3b). This works out at around CHF 4,700 p.a. per household1. A narrower measure, which excludes damage to the environment, puts the average monetary cost per household at around CHF 2,570 p.a.

The report then weighs this CHF 19.9 billion cost against the sector’s net economic output of 3.4 billion and the 0.6 billion of import duties collected, to arrive at a net economic burden of CHF 15.9 billion.

The authors of the study recommend reform, which would include reduced import protection, reformed subsidies, reduced legal complexity, updated taxes around the transfer of land ownership to open the sector to new comers, structural changes that favour the environment, and new rules that would limit the emergence of dominant mega farms.

Some have reacted strongly to the report. The Swiss People’s Party (UDC/SVP) has called it laughable, saying it makes little sense to look at consumer prices. The figure to look at is the comparatively small and declining share of income spent on food (5.7%) in Switzerland, they say.

In addition, their response quotes an agri-food industry GDP figure of 90.0b compared to the 10.3b agricultural output figure in the Avenir Suisse analysis. However, the 90.0b includes the economic output of both the agricultural and food sectors and is incomparable.

Meanwhile, Switzerland’s struggling farmers are caught between the hope of greater government support and the harsh economic reality of operating under the current system. According to the newspaper Le Nouvelliste, 12% of Swiss farmers are facing burnout.


Tags: ,,
About Investec
Investec
Investec is a distinctive Specialist Bank and Asset Manager. We provide a diverse range of financial products and services to our niche client base.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *