by The Washington Post began this week by noting how the US economy seems to have lost its purported zip just when it needed that vitality the most. Never missing a chance to take a partisan swipe, of course, still there’s quite a lot of truth behind the charge. An actual economic boom produces cushion, enough of one that President Trump and his administration may have been counting on it when opting for full-blown shutdown. The coronavirus recession is exposing how the economy was not strong as it seemed https://t.co/ZEtH0vUJ2M — The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 29, 2020 Instead, more and more it looks as if everything just crumbled like a sand castle exposed in the rain. And it’s not as if there weren’t warning signs; underneath the glowing
Topics:
Jeffrey P. Snider considers the following as important: 5.) Alhambra Investments, China, currencies, economy, Featured, Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy, GFC2, Markets, nbs manufacturing pmi, nbs non-manufacturing pmi, newsletter, PMI
This could be interesting, too:
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Krypto-Ausblick 2025: Stehen Bitcoin, Ethereum & Co. vor einem Boom oder Einbruch?
Connor O'Keeffe writes The Establishment’s “Principles” Are Fake
Per Bylund writes Bitcoiners’ Guide to Austrian Economics
Ron Paul writes What Are We Doing in Syria?
The Washington Post began this week by noting how the US economy seems to have lost its purported zip just when it needed that vitality the most. Never missing a chance to take a partisan swipe, of course, still there’s quite a lot of truth behind the charge. An actual economic boom produces cushion, enough of one that President Trump and his administration may have been counting on it when opting for full-blown shutdown.
The coronavirus recession is exposing how the economy was not strong as it seemed https://t.co/ZEtH0vUJ2M
— The Washington Post (@washingtonpost) March 29, 2020
Instead, more and more it looks as if everything just crumbled like a sand castle exposed in the rain. And it’s not as if there weren’t warning signs; underneath the glowing headlines (many of them published by this same Washington Post) touting that formerly sparkling unemployment rate were survey after survey about how there had been an enormous proportion of workers who were always one paycheck away from beyond broke (I know this because M. Simmons sends me copies of, or links to, every single one).
This isn’t just about the restaurant industry. Many of the nation’s small businesses – of all types – won’t survive. Even if we somehow manage to get most of the workforce back to work and do it in record time, there’ll still be behavioral changes in the short term (caution) that will also end up lingering long after the coronavirus is forgotten (more general frugality).
And that’s assuming there isn’t much fallout from GFC2, a eurodollar tsunami of a global shortage the vast bulk of which we’ve yet to experience. What happened earlier this month was the water disappearing from the beaches, the warning of the actual wave’s approaching menace.
Unfortunately, economic data over the coming months will only be marginally useful. It’s tainted by the unprecedented. There’s not much to compare it to therefore we’re struggling to put some framework around it in order to make any kind of reasonable interpretation.
| So it is with the first slate of figures: those from China. The Chinese were first, obviously, in the pandemic fighting process. And it was their official PMI’s which had unveiled the record-setting nature of this first phase of global contraction. The numbers absolutely plummeted, followed shortly by China’s big three economic accounts (IP, retail sales, FAI) confirming the initial impulse.
But we already know that. What everyone wants to know now is how short the collapse might turn out to be so as to try to gauge how quickly the rebound comes. From there, perhaps some view on how strong it might be – smaller chances, everyone hopes, for long-term economic damage. The faster the global economy gets back going again, the greater the chance, it is being presumed, that a normal economy is just over the horizon. |
China PMI, 2005-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| On first glance, it appears that China’s NBS March 2020 PMI’s fall into that range. The Manufacturing Index had dropped down to 35.7 in February, non-manufacturing an incredible 29.6. Last night, the Chinese government said the turnaround had begun, the manufacturing PMI leaping up to 52 – the highest since September 2017 – while the non-manufacturing index also spiked to 52.3 (which remains at the low end of the historical range).
Best case scenario? Not quite. PMI’s are a weird sort of economic measurement. While being back above 50 is a sign that China’s economy is moving toward re-opening, the PMI’s don’t really have much to say about what that means. |
China PMI, 2005-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| A reading above 50 simply implies, in an oversimplified way, more firms are reporting gains in the particular categories than losses. Just above 50 is only a smaller favorable balance.
When the index falls to something like 35.7 or 29.6, what that meant was a near complete drop across the whole range of businesses in both economic segments. If the rebound was as instantaneous as people seem to be interpreting from these figures, then the PMI’s should have been something like 60 or even 70. All a 52 suggests when it follows a 35 is that it might not have gotten worse – in March. To immediately jump to the conclusion that it must be getting better is being impatient. Again, nobody really knows what the short run looks like, let alone anything beyond the short run. Furthermore, PMI’s are notoriously noisy month-to-month and there is every reason to suspect the volatility will be much higher given these circumstances. Considering government interference running in both directions, keeping some things shut down while getting other things restarted, both for non-economic reasons, this month’s numbers are of as little value as last month’s were. We also have to keep in mind that if the US economy hadn’t been as strong as it seemed (to some), China’s started out even weaker. In my own view, I’d have been more enthusiastic and optimistic had the numbers followed the 2008-09 pattern – steadily and more naturally coming back from the depths of the Great “Recession.” |
China PMI, 2010-2020(see more posts on China PMI, ) - Click to enlarge |
Instead, would anyone really be surprised if next month’s PMI’s sink back well below 50? After all, while China might be reopening (huge and still unconfirmed “if”) the rest of the world, China’s very customers, are just now closing up their wallets.
We won’t really get a good sense of things for several months. If by June China’s PMI’s are somewhere around 2009-10 levels, then we’ve got a chance.
You Might Also Like
More Synchronized, More Downturn, Still Global
China was the world economy’s best hope in 2017. Like it was the only realistic chance to push out of the post-2008 doldrums, a malaise that has grown increasingly spasmatic and dangerous the longer it goes on. Communist authorities, some of them, anyway, reacted to Euro$ #3’s fallout early on in 2016 by dusting off their Keynes. A stimulus panic that turned out to be more panic than stimulus.
Three Short Run Factors Don’t Make A Long Run Difference
There are three things the markets have going for them right now, and none of them have anything to do with the Federal Reserve. More and more conditions resemble the early thirties in that respect, meaning no respect for monetary powers. This isn’t to say we are repeating the Great Depression, only that the paths available to the system to use in order to climb out of this mess have similarly narrowed.
That’s what’s ultimately going to matter the most, not what comes next but what comes after what’s next. This is why it is paramount to pay close attention to longer term indications (and stocks are not among this group).
Those three positive factors begin with the intense buying interest in stocks including short covering. Apparently, the sharp drop on Wall Street has left many especially
It’s Not About Jobless Claims Today, It’s About What Will Hamper Job Growth In A Few Months
You’ve no doubt heard about the jobless claims number. At an incomprehensible 3.28 million Americans filing for unemployment for the first time, this level far exceeded the wildest expectations as the economic costs of the shutdown continue to come in far more like the worst case. And as bad as 3mm is, the real hidden number is likely much higher.
Banks Or (euro)Dollars? That Is The (only) Question
It used to be that at each quarter’s end the repo rate would rise often quite far. You may recall the end of 2018, following a wave of global liquidations and curve collapsing when the GC rate (UST) skyrocketed to 5.149%, nearly 300 bps above the RRP “floor.” Chalked up to nothing more than 2a7 or “too many” Treasuries, it was to be ignored as the Fed at that point was still forecasting inflation and rate hikes.
China’s Dollar Problem Puts the Sync In Globally Synchronized Downturn
Because the prevailing theory behind the global slowdown is “trade wars”, most if not all attention is focused on China. While the correct target, everyone is coming it at from the wrong direction. The world awaits a crash in Chinese exports engineered by US tariffs. It’s not happening, at least according to China’s official statistics.
More Signals Of The Downturn, Globally Synchronized
For US importers, October is their month. And it makes perfect sense how it would be. With the Christmas season about to kick into full swing each and every November, the time for retailers to stock up in hearty anticipation is in the weeks beforehand. The goods, a good many future Christmas presents, find themselves in transit from all over the world during the month of October.
A Sour End To The 2010’s Doesn’t Have To Spoil The Entire 2020’s
It has been perhaps the most astonishing divergence in the first two decades of 21st century history. In late 2017, Western economic officials (mostly central bankers) were taking their victory laps. They took great pains to tell the world it was due to their profound wisdom, deep courage, and, most of all, determined patience, that they had been able to see their policies through to the light of day (no thanks to voters around the world).
Take Your Pick of PMI’s Today, But It’s Not Really An Either/Or
Take your pick, apparently. On the one hand, IHS Markit confirmed its flash estimate for the US economy during February. Late last month the group had reported a sobering guess for current conditions. According to its surveys of both manufacturers and service sector companies, the system stumbled badly last month, the composite PMI tumbling to 49.6 from 53.3 in January.
Tags: China,currencies,economy,Featured,Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy,GFC2,Markets,nbs manufacturing pmi,nbs non-manufacturing pmi,newsletter,PMI