by Does anyone remember the SLR “cliff?” Of course you don’t, because in the end it didn’t seem to make any difference. For a few weeks, it was kind of ubiquitous if only in the sense that it was another one of those deep plumbing issues no one seems able to understand (forcing all the “experts” to run to Investopedia in order write something up about it). Whatever this thing was and was going to be, it sounded ridiculously earth-shattering. And then, poof, it was gone. Banks had made a major deal out of it because, well, they don’t like it. Thus, while the world’s attention was fixed in this area, why not try to beat it back by hyping its negative potential? It was absolutely true that the SLR in this case was going to make holding safe and liquid instruments more
Topics:
Jeffrey P. Snider considers the following as important: 5.) Alhambra Investments, bonds, currencies, economy, Featured, Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy, inflation, Interest rates, Markets, newsletter, Reflation, slr cliff, U.S. Treasuries, Yield Curve
This could be interesting, too:
Guillermo Alcala writes USD/CHF slides to test 0.8645 support with US inflation data on tap
Swissinfo writes Swiss central bank posts CHF62.5bn profit
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Trump-Faktor und Marktbedingungen könnten für neuen Bitcoin-Rekord sorgen
Charles Hugh Smith writes Is Social Media Actually “Media,” Or Is It Something Else?
| Does anyone remember the SLR “cliff?” Of course you don’t, because in the end it didn’t seem to make any difference. For a few weeks, it was kind of ubiquitous if only in the sense that it was another one of those deep plumbing issues no one seems able to understand (forcing all the “experts” to run to Investopedia in order write something up about it). Whatever this thing was and was going to be, it sounded ridiculously earth-shattering.
And then, poof, it was gone. Banks had made a major deal out of it because, well, they don’t like it. Thus, while the world’s attention was fixed in this area, why not try to beat it back by hyping its negative potential? It was absolutely true that the SLR in this case was going to make holding safe and liquid instruments more balance sheet “expensive.” In the wake of the last GFC, in March 2020, the federal government had issued trillions in new debt while at the same time the Federal Reserve created trillions in new bank reserves. |
UST Yield Curve - Click to enlarge |
| Both are asset classes which come under the latest Basel tricks intended to capture more of bank balance sheet behavior than the simple capital ratios which had proved worthless during GFC1.
Not wanting to upset government funding markets nor the Fed’s QE purchase pace, authorities issued a one-year reprieve for both UST’s and bank reserves – these wouldn’t be calculated for SLR purposes. The single yearly amnesty was set to expire on April 1, thus the SLR “cliff” was in the regulation being re-applied without exception. And there had been some noticeable dealer selling in Treasuries – though it wasn’t absolutely clear the cliff was the reason for this. It may have simply been reflationary disinclination; rates were rising at the time as inflation and growth prospects seemed to have been picking up. Either way, BOND ROUT!!!!! This whole SLF cliff business, however, was misunderstood for any number of reasons but mostly pertaining to balance sheet implications. The very fact banks were using this as an excuse was meaningful in what it said about their perceptions of the situation more generally; as well as Jay Powell’s lack of response to it. Many came to believe that the Fed would end up surrendering, giving in to banks at the last minute after making some symbolic stand. I didn’t think so, and for reasons that looked a lot like experience with negative interest rates.
What ended up happening instead? Banks and other financial firms went right back to buying the safety and liquidity of UST’s anyway! The SLF “cliff” raised the balance sheet costs for holding those plus bank reserves, and to the day I wrote this LT UST yields have been dropping as those higher balance sheet costs have been factored by the financial system anyway and incorporated into higher UST prices – not more and accelerated selling of safety. Why?
|
|
| Quite simply, it doesn’t matter that holding UST’s (and bank reserves) is now more costly, the perceived risks of holding anything else must be higher. And getting worse all the time.
Everything is supposed to be going right, and the US economy, in particular, leading the world to mend. Except, in US bond markets only beginning with Treasury investors – a class who includes these banks bearing SLR surcharges – there’s only deep and profound skepticism being consistently priced into these very instruments. Have you seen real yields? |
ISM UST 10s area Reflation - Click to enlarge |
|
In other words, the SLR cliff was only important in yet again demonstrating the unwillingness of the banking system to do much other than hold the safe and liquid stuff no matter what authorities say or do. Jay Powell wanted a higher regulatory burden hoping, if for plain emotional reasons, this would propel riskier activities. It didn’t. Instead, banks have eagerly paid the higher balance sheet costs anyway. And that remains a huge red flag going forward. It would’ve been something without this SLR business; but to see yields fall, UST prices rise, even with now higher associated balance sheet costs? There’s more going wrong than right by a wide margin. |
ISM TIPS Breaks, Jan 2019 - June 2021 - Click to enlarge |
And this includes, obviously, all the inflationary CPI’s and PCE Deflators.
Again, real yields.
You Might Also Like
A Clear Balance of Global Inflation Factors
2021-06-30
Back at the end of May, Germany’s statistical accounting agency (deStatis) added another one to the inflationary inferno raging across the mainstream media. According to its flash calculations, German consumer prices last month had increased by the fastest rate in 13 years.
Weekly SNB Sight Deposits and Speculative Positions: Inflation is there, CHF must Rise
2021-06-28
Update June 28 2021: SNB intervening. Sight Deposits have risen by +0.4 bn CHF, this means that the SNB is intervening and buying Euros and Dollars.
The FOMC Accidentally Exposes Itself (Reverse Repo-style)
2021-06-18
Initially, the dots got all the attention. Though these things are beyond hopeless, the media needs them to write up its account of a more fruitful monetary policy outcome because markets continue to discount that entirely.
Copper Corroding PPI
2021-06-17
Yesterday, lumber. Today, copper. The “doctor” has been in reverse for better than two months now, with trading in the current session pounding the commodity to a new multi-month low. Down almost $0.19 for the day, an unusual and eye-opening loss, this brings the cumulative decline to 9.2% since the peak way back on May 11.
Rechecking On Bill And His Newfound Followers
2021-04-09
The benchmark 10-year US Treasury has obtained some bids. Not long ago the certain harbinger of bond rout doom, the long end maybe has joined the rest of the world in its global pause if somewhat later than it had begun elsewhere (including, importantly, its own TIPS real yield backyard).
What Gold Says About UST Auctions
2021-03-11
The “too many” Treasury argument which ignited early in 2018 never made a whole lot of sense. It first showed up, believe it or not, in 2016. The idea in both cases was fiscal debt; Uncle Sam’s deficit monster displayed a voracious appetite never in danger of slowing down even though – Economists and central bankers claimed – it would’ve been wise to heed looming inflationary pressures to cut back first.
Three Things About Today’s UST Sell-off, Beginning With Fedwire
2021-02-28
Three relatively quick observations surrounding today’s UST selloff.1. The intensity. Reflation is the underlying short run basis, but there is ample reason to suspect quite a bit more than that alone given the unexpected interruption in Fedwire yesterday.
What Might Be In *Another* Market-based Yield Curve Twist?
2021-02-23
With the UST yield curve currently undergoing its own market-based twist, it’s worth investigating a couple potential reasons for it. On the one hand, the long end, clear cut reflation: markets are not, as is commonly told right now, pricing 1979 Great Inflation #2, rather how the next few years may not be as bad (deflationary) as once thought a few months ago.
Tags: Bonds,currencies,economy,Featured,Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy,inflation,Interest rates,Markets,newsletter,Reflation,slr cliff,U.S. Treasuries,Yield Curve