by Summary:
VoxEU, February 5, 2021. HTML. Based on CEPR DP 15457, I assess possible implications of the introduction of retail CBDC for bank profits. The model implies annual implicit subsidies to U.S. banks of up to 0.8 percent of GDP during the period 1999-2017.
Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Bank, Central Bank, Central bank digital currency, Contributions, Deposit, Equivalence, Research, Reserves for all, Subsidy
This could be interesting, too:
VoxEU, February 5, 2021. HTML. Based on CEPR DP 15457, I assess possible implications of the introduction of retail CBDC for bank profits. The model implies annual implicit subsidies to U.S. banks of up to 0.8 percent of GDP during the period 1999-2017.
Topics:
Dirk Niepelt considers the following as important: Bank, Central Bank, Central bank digital currency, Contributions, Deposit, Equivalence, Research, Reserves for all, Subsidy
This could be interesting, too:
Dirk Niepelt writes Does the US Administration Prohibit the Use of Reserves?
Dirk Niepelt writes “Pricing Liquidity Support: A PLB for Switzerland” (with Cyril Monnet and Remo Taudien), UniBe DP, 2025
Dirk Niepelt writes The New Keynesian Model and Reality
Dirk Niepelt writes “Money and Banking with Reserves and CBDC,” JF, 2024
VoxEU, February 5, 2021. HTML.
Based on CEPR DP 15457, I assess possible implications of the introduction of retail CBDC for bank profits. The model implies annual implicit subsidies to U.S. banks of up to 0.8 percent of GDP during the period 1999-2017.