by From a monetary policy perspective, smooth is what you are aiming for. What central bankers want in this age of expectations management is for a little bit of steady inflation. Why not zero? Because, they decided, policymakers need some margin of error. Since there is no money in monetary policy, it takes time for oblique “stimulus” signals to feed into the psychology of markets and the economy. Thus, a little steady inflation as insurance against the real evil. In that sense, the core CPI is perhaps best suited to judge policy success on its own terms. Set aside the oft-emotional objections to the subject, the BLS’s core measure of inflation strips out food and energy prices because history has proved those are moved around often in temporary bursts one way or
Topics:
Jeffrey P. Snider considers the following as important: 5.) Alhambra Investments, bonds, contraction, Core CPI, CPI, currencies, Deflation, economy, Featured, Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy, food prices, inflation, jay powell, Markets, Monetary Policy, newsletter, oil prices, Recession, WTI
This could be interesting, too:
Nachrichten Ticker - www.finanzen.ch writes Krypto-Ausblick 2025: Stehen Bitcoin, Ethereum & Co. vor einem Boom oder Einbruch?
Connor O'Keeffe writes The Establishment’s “Principles” Are Fake
Per Bylund writes Bitcoiners’ Guide to Austrian Economics
Ron Paul writes What Are We Doing in Syria?
|
From a monetary policy perspective, smooth is what you are aiming for. What central bankers want in this age of expectations management is for a little bit of steady inflation. Why not zero? Because, they decided, policymakers need some margin of error. Since there is no money in monetary policy, it takes time for oblique “stimulus” signals to feed into the psychology of markets and the economy. Thus, a little steady inflation as insurance against the real evil. In that sense, the core CPI is perhaps best suited to judge policy success on its own terms. Set aside the oft-emotional objections to the subject, the BLS’s core measure of inflation strips out food and energy prices because history has proved those are moved around often in temporary bursts one way or another. |
CPI less Food & Energy, 1983-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| More noise than anything, though painful to most folks.
We need to know what’s truly going on underneath all the attention on oil and beef. Crude prices can and do turn on a dime leaving the rest as it was. As you might expect, the core CPI, therefore, is very rarely negative. The monthly change in the seasonally adjusted series has been positive in just about every single month. Dating back to 1961, the monthly change has been negative only nine times out of the 711 through April 2020. Since 1982, only five times. You can probably guess where I’m going. According to the latest estimates from the BLS, core inflation just fell by the most on record. Not only that, this was the second straight monthly decline, accounting now for two of the nine (or five). The last time there was two in a row it was the end of 1982 at the trough of what had been the worst economic contraction before 2008. |
CPI less Food & Energy, 1964-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| As flawed as the CPI is, as unnatural the smoothing of seasonal adjustments, you have to admit the correlation. When economic conditions are at their worst, corroborated by a whole range of unrelated accounts, such is this deflationary calculation (the lone modern exception being Janet Yellen’s 2017 Verizon unlimited wireless melodrama, and even that fits the technical specifications of this topic).
Why is Jay Powell trying so hard? Here’s a big part of that answer. He believes it’s his job to convince economic agents from businesses to market players that this is all just a temporary setback, a big one but nothing longer than maybe a few months. |
CPI Changes on Energy, 1995-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| “Stimulus”, he implies, will guarantee it.
Hold on all you suffering consumers and enterprises, the cavalry’s on the way! What he’s really afraid of is deflation; true deflation of the type showing up above. As I wrote at the beginning of this month, it’s potentially the big one:
The rest of the CPI report shows what we already know and have expected. Oil prices absolutely collapsed, down by almost 75% year-over-year (average) taking with them gasoline. The CPI’s energy basket, which is driven by motor fuel pricing, fell by more than 17% year-over-year on a 31% decline in pump prices. |
CPI Changes on Energy, 1995-2020 - Click to enlarge |
CPI Changes on Energy, 1995-2020 - Click to enlarge |
|
| As I wrote in early May, that’s deflationary pressure if stopping short of the full-blown evil. The declines in core CPI values, however, those suggest a wide swath of the business sector (services as well as goods) is being forced to heavily discount product (and then production). The real economy taking it a step further beyond simply commodity pressures.
The latter, a commodity crash, obviously isn’t a good sign for the global economy but so much discounting that it shows up all across the non-energy/food components of the CPI indicates deeper, more dangerous imbalances underneath it all. |
CPI Services less Rent of Shelter, 1990-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| And remember, these are April’s figures; more than a month and a half of “money printing” and signals for gross “accommodation” supposedly by the Fed in the books.
What Powell might say in response is that, again, it takes time for his magic to (allegedly) work its way through all the layers of finance and economy. That’s why they had convinced themselves inflation at 2% consistently (the monetary policy target applies to the PCE Deflator rather than the CPI, given the differences in construction it calculates out to about 3% for the latter) was the wise choice, that margin for error. We’re definitely in the error. But they never achieved it, despite so many inane promises that it was definitely guaranteed to certainly happen in 2018 and 2019. In other words, the lack of success leading up to this year’s massive contraction is a factor, just not in the way it was supposed to play out. Now the CPI suggests, for the second month in a row, even if monetary policy is effective the business sector may not have time to wait around for some psychological boost. We already know that much from the labor data (as well as clues about that effectiveness). |
CES: Civilian Labor Force Level, 2007-2020 - Click to enlarge |
| Like 1982 or even 2009, such deflationary months were, thankfully, few and never sustained. As bad as the Great “Recession” had been, after more than a year of it the global economy found a bottom and lower state of equilibrium anyway.
This, however, is something else altogether – obviously we can’t expect anything at all like the middle eighties to save us. Furthermore, those prior bouts of outright deflation showed up at the end of those specific, nasty contractions. These have appeared right from the beginning. At the very least, it complicates the situation for what everyone hopes will be a “V” shaped recovery since price discounting like this also takes time to ruin more beyond the initial shape (second and third order negative effects). |
Inflation Expectations, 2003-2019 - Click to enlarge |
| There was certainly a “V” beginning in 1983, but we are on the total opposite side of the monetary spectrum. And only an “L” from 2009 forward. Neither of those cut nearly as deep as this one appears to have already. It doesn’t mean the worst case, necessarily, but if you’re holding out for the best possible outcome or even something close to it, Jay Powell’s goal and scenario, these are numbers you just don’t want to see. |  |
You Might Also Like
Schaetze To That
When Mario Draghi sat down for his scheduled press conference on April 4, 2012, it was a key moment and he knew it. The ECB had finished up the second of its “massive” LTRO auctions only weeks before. Draghi was still relatively new to the job, having taken over for Jean-Claude Trichet the prior November amidst substantial turmoil.
COT Black: No Love For Super-Secret Models
As I’ve said, it is a threefold failure of statistical models. The first being those which showed the economy was in good to great shape at the start of this thing. Widely used and even more widely cited, thanks to Jay Powell and his 2019 rate cuts plus “repo” operations the calculations suggested the system was robust.
History Shows You Should Infer Nothing From Powell’s Pause
Jay Powell says that three’s not a crowd, at least not for his rate cuts, but four would be. As usual, central bankers like him always hedge and say that “should conditions warrant” the FOMC will be more than happy to indulge (the NYSE). But what he means in his heart of hearts is that there probably won’t be any need.
US Sales and Production Remain Virus-Free, But Still Aren’t Headwind-Free
The lull in US consumer spending on goods has reached a fifth month. The annual comparisons aren’t good, yet they somewhat mask the more recent problems appearing in the figures. According to the Census Bureau, total retail sales in January rose 4.58% year-over-year (unadjusted). Not a good number, but better, seemingly, than early on in 2019 when the series was putting out 3s and 2s.
The Greenspan Moon Cult
Taking another look at what I wrote about repo and the latest developments yesterday, it may be worthwhile to spend some additional time on the “why” as it pertains to so much determined official blindness, an unshakeable devotion to otherwise easily explained lunar events.
What Happens When Central Banks Buy Stocks (ETFs)? Well, We Already Know
Can we please dispense with all notions that monetary policy works? Specifically balance sheet expansion via any scale asset purchase programs. Nowhere has that been more apparent than Japan. Go back and reread all the promised benefits from BoJ’s Big Bang QQE that were confidently written in 2013. The biggest bazooka ever conceived has fallen short in every conceivable way.
Everyone Knows The Gov’t Wants A ‘Controlled’ Weimar
There are two parts behind the inflation mongering. The first, noted yesterday, is the Fed’s balance sheet, particularly its supposedly monetary remainder called bank reserves. The central bank is busy doing something, a whole bunch of something, therefore how can it possibly turn out to be anything other than inflationary?The answer: the Federal Reserve is not a central bank, not really.
We All Know Who’s On First, But What’s On Second?
It wasn’t entirely unexpected, though when it was announced it was still quite a lot to take in. On September 1, 2005, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) reported that the nation’s personal savings rate had turned negative during the month of July. The press release announcing the number, in trying to explain the result was reduced instead to a tautology, “The negative personal saving reflects personal outlays that exceed disposable personal income.
Tags: Bonds,contraction,Core CPI,CPI,currencies,Deflation,economy,Featured,Federal Reserve/Monetary Policy,food prices,inflation,jay powell,Markets,Monetary Policy,newsletter,oil prices,recession,WTI