Open Letter to Crispin Odey

by
Keith Weiner
My articles My siteAbout meMy booksMy videos
Follow on:TwitterFacebook

Crispin Odey

I am writing in response to the comments you made in a letter to investors yesterday, which were widely reported. You have set the gold community afire, with claims that are not new and not true. So I shall attempt to douse the flames.

As everyone knows, President Roosevelt outlawed the ownership of gold in 1933. Although gold was legalized in 1975, fears linger today that the governments may repeat this heinous act. There is no reason for this fear. In 1933, Roosevelt had two monetary policy goals to accomplish by banning gold.

One was to stop the run on the banks. At that time, the dollar was redeemable. You brought a twenty dollar bill to a bank, and got a gold coin of just under one ounce. Redemptions forced the banks to sell bonds to raise the gold. If redemptions happened fast enough, a bank might default on its obligation, and be declared bankrupt.

The other was to lower the interest rate. All this selling of bonds pushed bond prices down, and hence interest rates up (interest moving inverse to bond price).

Today, the dollar is irredeemable and these two reasons are inapplicable. There are no runs on the banking system, and the Fed is having its way with interest rates.

You said:

“It is no surprise that people are buying gold. But the authorities may attempt at some point to de-monetise gold, making it illegal to own as a private individual. They will only do this if they feel the need to create a stable unit of account for world trade.”

Indeed, people are buying gold. With both fiscal and monetary policy now gone completely mad, they have good reason. But the government has no power to dictate what is money, any more than what is gravity. Money means the most marketable commodity, and the extinguisher of debt. The dollar is not a commodity, and being a credit, it cannot extinguish a debt. Money is gold, nothing else, as John Pierpont Morgan said.

Nor do they have the power to make their unit of account stable. Emperor Diocletian infamously imposed price controls. Even with the death penalty, it didn’t work. Banning gold ownership today would have no effect on prices for another reason. Prices have nothing to do with gold.

Anyways, falling interest rates put downward pressure on commodity and consumer prices (which can be counteracted by regulatory and tax burdens). Prices are now falling (despite rising regulatory burden) except for food, where the government has damaged supply chains.

Next:

“History is filled with examples where rulers have, in moments of crisis, resorted to debasing the coinage… I very much expect that the authorities will fight these prevailing trends for every inch of the way, but I also expect them to lose the fight.”

Debasement, as in the time of Diocletian, referred to reducing the gold content of a coin. People were supposed to trade the new coins, which are really worth less than the old ones, at the same value. They didn’t.

But today, there is no gold content. In that sense, the government’s paper (electronic) currency cannot be de-based. It has no “base” in the first place. The bond is paid only in dollars, and the dollar is backed only by bonds. It is self-referential, and hence its value is undefined.

An increase in the quantity of dollars is not like an increase in the quantity of debased gold coins. Dollars are credit. And borrowing more credit into existence is a different mechanism, a different cause with different effects. We are not awash with silver-coated bronze coins. We are drowning in debt.

Finally:

“Gold is the only escape from global monetising but the authorities hate gold doing well!”

Central bankers don’t think about gold. They worry all day about consumer prices, unemployment, and GDP. And to some extent, equities and properties. Greenspan and Volcker are the last two Fed Chairmen who came of age as professionals under the last vestiges of a gold standard. No one since then has a memory of it, and of course the Keynesian and Monetarist rubbish taught in economics schools says little about gold other than blaming it for the Great Depression.

But the tax authorities love when the price of gold goes up, for the same reason speculators do. With rising price comes profit-taking. People sell their gold, and the tax man takes his share.

If the government tried to confiscate gold, it would have no effect on bank solvency, interest rates, or consumer prices. No one can predict what politicians might do in the future. However, the old fears of gold confiscation are not based on solid reasoning.

© 2020 Monetary Metals

You Might Also Like

So Much Bond Bull

Count me among the bond vigilantes. On the issue of supply I yield (pun intended) to no one. The US government is the brokest entity humanity has ever conceived – and that was before March 2020. There will be a time, if nothing is done, where this will matter a great deal.That time isn’t today nor is it tomorrow or anytime soon because it’s the demand side which is so confusing and misdirected.

There Was Never A Need To Translate ‘Weimar’ Into Japanese

After years of futility, he was sure of the answer. The Bank of Japan had spent the better part of the roaring nineties fighting against itself as much as the bubble which had burst at the outset of the decade. Letting fiscal authorities rule the day, Japan’s central bank had largely sat back introducing what it said was stimulus in the form of lower and lower rates.No, stupid, declared Milton Friedman.

No Flight To Recognize Shortage

If there’s been one small measure of progress, and a needed one, it has been the mainstream finally pushing commentary into the right category. Back in ’08, during the worst of GFC1 you’d hear it all described as “flight to safety.” That, however, didn’t correctly connote the real nature of what was behind the global economy’s dramatic wreckage. Flight to safety, whether Treasuries or dollars, wasn’t it.

Raising Rates to Fight Inflation, Report 24 Nov

Physics students study mechanical systems in which pulleys are massless and frictionless. Economics students study monetary systems in which rising prices are everywhere and always caused by rising quantity of currency. There is a similarity between this pair of assumptions. Both are facile. They oversimplify reality, and if one is not careful they can lead to spectacularly wrong conclusions.

Money and Prices Are a Dynamic System, Report 1 Dec

The basic idea behind the Quantity Theory of Money could be stated as: too much money supply is chasing too little goods supply, so prices rise. We have debunked this from several angles. For example, we can use a technique that every first year student in physics is expected to know. Dimensional analysis looks at the units on both sides of an equation.

The End of an Epoch, Report 8 Dec

“There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose.”

Monetary Metals Gold Brief 2020

We apologize for not posting articles during January. We have been busy, and going forward will publish a separate Market Report every Monday morning plus macroeconomics essays later in the week, as time permits.

Clean gold: How Switzerland could set new supply chain standards

Switzerland is the undisputed top dog of the global gold industry, refining a majority of the world’s gold, as well as being the leading exporter. But how seriously does the country take its responsibility to ensure sustainable mining and the protection of human rights?