by Switzerland’s agricultural sector costs the country CHF 19.9 billion while contributing only CHF 3.4 billion, concludes a study published by the think tank Avenir Suisse. © Denis Linine | Dreamstime.com The CHF 19.9 billion cost is made up of tax breaks and direct federal and cantonal payments to the sector (4.9b), the cost of artificially inflated consumer prices due to import restrictions (4.6b), environmental damage (7.3b), and the cost to export businesses (3.1b) from agricultural trade restrictions. At 51% of farm receipts, Switzerland has the third highest level of farm subsidies in Europe after Norway and Iceland. The cost of high consumer prices is based on international price comparisons, and the environmental cost brakes down into the cost of greenhouse gas emissions (0.4b),
Topics:
Investec considers the following as important: Business & Economy, Editor's Choice, environment, Swiss farm subsidies
This could be interesting, too:
Investec writes Swiss health care costs continued to rise in 2022
Investec writes Swiss parliament rejects adding dental care to basic insurance
Investec writes Study shows how Swiss doctors and hospitals overcharge
Investec writes Health care cost brake initiative to go to a vote
Switzerland’s agricultural sector costs the country CHF 19.9 billion while contributing only CHF 3.4 billion, concludes a study published by the think tank Avenir Suisse.
© Denis Linine | Dreamstime.com
The CHF 19.9 billion cost is made up of tax breaks and direct federal and cantonal payments to the sector (4.9b), the cost of artificially inflated consumer prices due to import restrictions (4.6b), environmental damage (7.3b), and the cost to export businesses (3.1b) from agricultural trade restrictions.
At 51% of farm receipts, Switzerland has the third highest level of farm subsidies in Europe after Norway and Iceland.
The cost of high consumer prices is based on international price comparisons, and the environmental cost brakes down into the cost of greenhouse gas emissions (0.4b), excess nitrogen damage (1.5b), pesticide and peat bog cleanup (0.2b) and lost biodiversity resulting from excess nitrogen and pesticide use (4.9b).
The 3.1b related to import restrictions, is based largely on a study which looks at the impact of reaching a full trade deal with the EFTA block.
The 84% of the total cost that is borne by the public via taxes (4.9b), artificially high prices (4.6b) and environmental damage (7.3b) works out at around CHF 4,500 p.a. per household. A narrower measure, which excludes damage to the environment, puts the average monetary cost per household at around CHF 2,570 p.a., more than 3% of a gross median Swiss salary.
The report then weighs this CHF 19.9 billion cost against the sector’s net economic output of 3.4 billion and the 0.6 billion of import duties collected, to arrive at a net economic burden of CHF 15.9 billion.
The study’s authors recommend reform, which would include reduced import protection, reformed subsidies, reduced legal complexity, updated taxes around the transfer of land ownership to open the sector to new comers, structural changes that favour the environment, and rules that would limit the emergence of dominant mega farms.
Some, such as the Swiss People’s Party (UDC/SVP) have reacted strongly to the report. One party member described it as pseudoscientific nonsense. Another said it makes little sense to look at consumer prices. The figure to look at is the comparatively small and declining share of income spent on food (5.7%) in Switzerland. In addition, he quotes an agri-food industry GDP figure of 90.0b compared to the 10.3b agricultural output figure in the Avenir Suisse analysis. However, the 90.0b includes the economic output of both the agricultural and food sectors and is incomparable, although it does allude to an industry that operates symbiotically with the local agricultural sector to some extent.
Meanwhile, Switzerland’s struggling farmers are caught between the hope of greater government support and the harsh economic reality of operating under the current system. According to the newspaper Le Nouvelliste, 12% of Swiss farmers are facing burnout.
More on this:
Avenir Suisse study (in French) – Take a 5 minute French test now
For more stories like this on Switzerland follow us on Facebook and Twitter.