by
Swissinfo
My articles My booksMy videos
Follow on:TwitterFacebookGoogle +

In July 2021, the chemical firm Lonza said it would start its ten-year clean-up of the hazardous waste landfill site at Gamsenried, canton Valais, from 2023-2024. The site was used by Lonza to deposit its production residues from 1918 to 1978. This photo was taken in 1987. Keystone

The widespread dioxin pollution uncovered in Lausanne has surprised many and raised concerns about the health consequences, clean-up costs and extent of the problem. The small Alpine nation may be well known for its stunning natural beauty, but thousands of sites contaminated with various other pollutants still need remediation.

Last month the Lausanne authorities announced that much of the soil in the centre of the western Swiss city is contaminated with dioxin. The cause: an old waste incineration plant closed between 2005-2009. Attention now turns to the costly clean-up and health concerns.

The local authorities say there is no need to panic. Dioxin may be carcinogenic but only a daily absorption of large quantities is problematic. The city’s drinking water is not affected. Yet the Lausanne case has raised local and wider concerns.

“We thought that this problem had been resolved by [fitting filters] to treat the smoke from the incinerators in the 1990s, as that managed to seriously reduce dioxin levels. But we forgot the historic pollution that was carried out over 30-40 years,” Nathalie ChèvreExternal link, a professor of ecotoxicology at the University of Lausanne, told SWI swissinfo.ch.

Experts agree it is likely that similar dioxin problems will arise in other Swiss regions with incineration plants.

Many of Switzerland’s 26 cantons have their own incineration facilities, some much older than others. Cantons Geneva, Fribourg and Valais have previously investigated around their plants for dioxin; a handful of other regions – Vaud, Neuchâtel, St. Gallen, Bern, Glarus, Graubünden and the city of Zurich – are reacting now. The numbers could grow. The Swiss government has shared a draft revision of the environmental protection lawExternal link that would make the investigation and clean-up of public sites compulsory in the future. And dioxin could get added to the list of serious pollutants that cantons need to constantly monitor.

“Switzerland had a very important industrial history from the 1950s onwards that resulted in important environmental pollution. I don’t think these kinds of surprises are over,” said Chèvre.

Toxic legacy

The Lausanne case has put the spotlight on the issue of legacy contamination. Switzerland has a reputation for cleanliness and natural beauty, but industrial pollution is nothing new in the small densely populated country.

Switzerland is home to almost 38,000 sites that the Federal Office for the Environment listsExternal link as polluted (see map below). Of these, about 4,000 require serious clean-up. More than 1,500 have already been remediated. The polluted sites are mostly old landfills (40%) and industrial areas (50%); the rest are army shooting ranges (10%) and accident sites (1%). They cover a total area of 225 square kilometres. Some of the major legacy sitesExternal link are linked to the Swiss chemical industry.

“Over the past 20 years, Switzerland has pragmatic, effective legislation in place that requires the clean-up of all contaminated sites when they represent a danger for people’s health or for the environment,” Christine Wermeille, head of contaminated sites at the environment office, recently told Swiss public radio RTS. Clean-up priority is given to sites that directly threaten underground water sources.

The environment office says Switzerland is making “great progress” cleaning up polluted sitesExternal link and compares well with neighbouring countries.

Chèvre agrees on this last point. “We have a legislation that is much more restrictive than in neighbouring countries.” But the clean-up of contaminated sites is advancing “very, very slowly”, she added.

Martin Forter, director of the Doctors for the Environment non-governmental organisationExternal link, is more critical. He feels the federal authorities are “too pragmatic” and could be even stricter. He says most contaminated sites don’t require serious work, but a dozen pose big problems.

“There are landfill sites that need to be urgently cleaned up like Gamsenried in canton Valais, Pila in canton Fribourg or Feldreben at Muttenz in canton Basel,” he said. “There is also the Teuftal chemical waste plant in canton Bern that belongs to the Basel industry that needs to be cleaned up in the long term.”

Costly clean-up

The environment office admits the challenges are huge. Cleaning up hazardous landfill sites can be dangerous, as you have no idea exactly what is inside, or how pollutants will react.

Meeting the future goal of remediating all contaminated sites by 2040 will also be extremely costly – estimated at CHF5 billionExternal link – .and impossible unless things speed up and more resources are available, it says.

“I think everyone generally agrees that we need to do something. But as soon as you start discussing money, things become much more complicated,” said Chèvre.

Under Swiss law, the “polluter pays” principle applies. The federal government pays towards the investigation, monitoring and remediation of polluted sites. It has also set up a “Contamination Fund” that taxes polluters to be able to quickly clean up dangerous sites.

But as those responsible for legacy pollution are often no longer present or insolvent, taxpayers must often bear the clean-up costs – around 40%. The draft law under consultation proposes increasing this to 60%. Asking the taxpayer to pay more for pollution by private companies is a tricky issue. But that said, CHF5 billion over 20 years is relatively small compared to the CHF220 billion annual expenditure of the Swiss public sector (federal government, cantons and communes).

“The main lesson of the Lausanne dioxin case is that we can rediscover pollution 30, 40, 50 even 60 years after it occurred,” said Chèvre. “It’s very important to be careful now with what we throw into the environment – into the air, water or soil – as it will most probably become a problem in the future.”

If they are not managed correctly, pollutants released today – pesticides, microplastics, micropollutants, fine particles, heavy metals like lead or hydrocarbons – may well come back to haunt us, warn experts.

You Might Also Like

Big Swiss companies obliged to report on climate risks from 2024

2021-08-19

From 2024, large Swiss firms will be legally bound to report on their climate-related risks. The government has now published guidelines on which companies and which risks will be involved.

Central Switzerland braces itself for another ‘flood of the century’

2021-07-18

Lakes and rivers in central Swiss cantons such as Bern and Lucerne have reached dangerous levels, and more rain is forecast for Thursday and Friday. On Wednesday authorities in canton Bern said water levels on Lake Thun, Lake Biel and in the city of Bern would significantly exceed flood limits in the coming days.

Swiss Narrowly Miss CO2 Emission Targets

2021-07-09

Switzerland has again failed to meet its goals for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, prompting a rise in CO2 taxes. Last year emissions from fuel, including heating oil and gas, were 31% lower than 1990 levels, according to data released by the Federal OfficeExternal link for the Environment on Wednesday. This is unchanged from 2019 and falls short of the required 33%.

Switzerland’s Battle of the Bees

2021-06-27

The risk to bees through pesticides and the ensuing effects on the world’s food crops have been the source of much debate. But do Swiss measures to support the domestic honeybee disadvantage the equally important wild bee?

Pesticide-free farming: can the vision seduce Swiss voters?

2021-06-14

Voters decide Sunday on two separate initiatives aiming to ban or reduce the use of synthetic pesticides in the country. Polls suggest the proposals are on the back foot. Is Switzerland about to become an organic farming pioneer?

Electricity watchdog sounds warning on Swiss energy security

2021-06-06

The Federal Electricity Commission (ElCom) has again voiced concern about Switzerland’s ability to secure sufficient power supplies in the coming years. While there is no immediate danger of shortfalls in the Alpine state, the electricity watchdog said on Thursday that more should be done to ensure domestic energy security in the mid to long term.

Swiss Aviation Sector Aims to go Carbon Neutral by 2050

2021-06-02

The Swiss aviation sector, which includes Swiss International Air Lines and Zurich Airport, has pledged to slash CO2 emissions and make flying net zero by 2050.

Overtourism could give way to Sustainable Travel

2021-05-13

Let me state from the outset, you won’t get a discount if you mention to your travel agent that you read this article when you book your trip to Switzerland this summer. But it will be nice to have you back; Switzerland – in line with much of Europe – is planning to open up to overseas visitors in a few short weeks. And since we haven’t seen you in a while, I expect you’ll be welcomed with open arms!