Trump’s Tax Plan, Clinton Corruption and Mainstream Media Propaganda

Fake Money, Fake Capital

OUZILLY, France – Little change in the markets on Monday. We are in the middle of vacation season. Who wants to think too much about the stock market? Not us! Yesterday, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump promised to reform the U.S. tax system.

His proposals are nothing new – simplification, fewer brackets, eliminate loopholes for rich people. But he also targeted the “carried interest” exemption. “Carried interest” – or “carry” –  is a term used in the financial industry to refer to what is essentially a performance bonus.

The exemption allows Wall Street money managers to count earnings as capital gains. This helps them keep more money in their pockets (capital gains are taxed at a rate of 23.8%. Labor income is taxed at a rate of 39.6%).

“Carry” is a compliment to the whole figment of a system. The capitalist financial world functions largely on credit, not capital. The earnings represented by “carry” take it one step further.

They are usually earnings on fake money, borrowed by speculators who think they are investors, and invested in gambles only made possible by the fake money system. Then the managers earn a bonus and treat it as though it were a capital gain.

Fake money. Fake savings. Fake interest rates. Fake capital. Fake capital gains.

Trump’s proposed tax brackets for income and capital gains taxes – click to enlarge.

This should actually even appeal to supporters of Bernie Sanders: the lowest income groups will be completely exempt from income and capital gains taxes under Trump’s plan. We expect to hear crickets from the socialists though. Oh, and below you will see why Trump only got $19,000 from hedge funds, while Hillary “we came, we saw, he died” Clinton got $48.5 million (crickets from assorted socialists so far). But who cares, Trump is Hitler, right?

Special Treatment

Mr. Trump’s proposal rests on the idea of fairness. If a plumber or an accountant has to pay income tax on a bonus, shouldn’t a private equity fund manager, too?  On the other hand, the system is riddled with special treatment.

One man gets a break because he invests in solar power. Another gets a break because he decides to retire. Still another uses a loophole to avoid paying taxes on his grandchildren’s college expenses.

But even with their loopholes, generally speaking, rich people pay more taxes than poor people. One person pays millions of dollars in taxes; another pays nothing at all. Mr. Trump says many Americans will pay “zero” under his plan.

Fair? Depends on what you mean by “fair.” If “fair” means treating all people the same, the tax system is unfair. But if “fair” means treating people differently according to whatever cockamamie scheme presidential hopefuls and the Parasitocracy come up with, “carry” is no more unfair than anything else.

But the tax system is duct tape for the Parasitocrats: With it they can fix almost anything.

Trump Tax Cut: Nearly as Much as All Discretionary Spending – click to enlarge.

Trump’s tax cut is not only bigger than that of all of his conservative competitors for the nomination combined was, it has the distinction of being as large as the entire amount of so-called discretionary spending in the US government budget. This implies there would have to be huge spending cuts, which would relieve the economy of one its greatest burdens (contrary to widely accepted myth, government spending does not “help” the economy, it burdens it).

Clinton Cash

Two things have appeared recently that help us understand how it works.  One is a documentary called Clinton Cash. It describes how the Clinton Foundation is used to funnel cash to the Clintons and their cronies.

The insiders make tax-free contributions to the Clinton Foundation. The foundation returns the favor. It sponsors a feel-good media campaign and, say, a visit to the Congo – both ostensibly to help rid Africa of poverty.

Clinton Cash – a documentary on the shady dealings of the Clinton Foundation. This is well worth watching – the corruption of the crony-socialist State in all its glory.

Backs are mutually scratched. And the insiders – often in the mining or construction business – end up with a very rich deal in a very poor country. We know one of these insiders personally. Nice guy. Smart guy. He knows how the game is played and plays it well.

Clinton Foundation – click to enlarge.

The speaking fees paid to the Clintons are such a transparent scam that we are genuinely surprised that the practice isn’t considered a huge scandal worthy of page 1. It certainly goes to show that the parasites have an iron grip on the media though.

Cartoon by Ramirez

News = Propaganda

Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that private, tax-exempt “think tanks” are also part of the Parasitocracy. They are supposed to be independent; that’s why contributions are usually tax-free. But there is nothing shocking about the examples the Times presents. In fact, they are just what you’d expect.

A corporation makes a contribution to a think tank. The thinkers then prepare research… organize an event… provide “expert” testimony – all designed to help the insiders get what they want.

Want to do a development project on government property? Want to sell drones to the feds, or to foreign governments? Want to build more aircraft carriers even though Navy strategists and private analysts regard them as unnecessary or obsolete?

Hey, you need a think tank on your side. And if you can’t buy one, start one yourself. Journalists are too lazy and too dull to bend over and look under the propaganda. In any case, it is the last thing readers want.

So, the next thing you know, you’ll see headlines in the newspapers: “Brookings Experts Say Development Plan Would Aid City”… “U.S. Needs More Aircraft Carriers, Say Experts”… “Israel, Saudi Arabia to Get More U.S. Drones”…

The public has no other point of reference. Propaganda is the same as “news.” Self-interested opinion cannot be distinguished from fact.

And the Parasitocracy – as far as the casual observer can tell – may as well be Hillary Clinton’s description of the government. It is “all of us.”

Corporate News – click to enlarge.

In the former Soviet Union most people fully realized that the Pravda was pure propaganda. The “manufacturing of consent” through corporate media in regulatory democracies tends to be more subtle, but it has lost a lot of its impact due to the advent of the internet. Lately, the media’s subtlety leaves a lot to be desired actually – whether its the rapists of Cologne, the Brexit or Trump, their bias could hardly be more obvious.