Summary:
Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage. Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending? [embedded content] Tags: Featured,newsletter
Topics:
Joakim Book considers the following as important: 6b) Mises.org, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage. Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending? [embedded content] Tags: Featured,newsletter
Topics:
Joakim Book considers the following as important: 6b) Mises.org, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
Marc Chandler writes Riksbank Cuts, Oil Slips, and the Yen Remains Under Pressure
Marc Chandler writes Market Pushes the Yen Lower, Helped by a Broadly Firmer Greenback
Martin Hartmann writes Jetzt anmelden! 18. Juni 2024 🥳
Helena Schulthess writes Kongress der «Students for Liberty» in Tbilisi (Georgien)
Many cities and states in this country have been tearing down or destroying monuments because they represent part of a past that progressives and leftists believe should not have existed. Yet each time we tear down something, we potentially lose part of an important heritage.
Original Article: Do Destroyed Monuments Represent a Past Not Worth Defending?
Tags: Featured,newsletter