Summary:
[unable to retrieve full-text content]In late May we learned that, after a five-month deployment to one of the most dangerous cities in the world, the American military would finally be going home. Well, not really. They already were home. The dangerous warzone was the American federal capital, Washington, DC. And the “danger” that the military was supposed to be countering was entirely government made.
Topics:
Jason Morgan considers the following as important: 6b) Mises.org, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
[unable to retrieve full-text content][unable to retrieve full-text content]In late May we learned that, after a five-month deployment to one of the most dangerous cities in the world, the American military would finally be going home. Well, not really. They already were home. The dangerous warzone was the American federal capital, Washington, DC. And the “danger” that the military was supposed to be countering was entirely government made.
Topics:
Jason Morgan considers the following as important: 6b) Mises.org, Featured, newsletter
This could be interesting, too:
Martin Hartmann writes Upcoming Events
Marc Chandler writes Consolidative Tone to Start the Week
Daniel Lacalle writes The Fed Fears a Bond Meltdown
Mark Thornton writes Commercial Real Estate’s Future
In late May we learned that, after a five-month deployment to one of the most dangerous cities in the world, the American military would finally be going home. Well, not really. They already were home. The dangerous warzone was the American federal capital, Washington, DC. And the “danger” that the military was supposed to be countering was entirely government made.